|
If you are going to make the type of claims that you are, then you better be prepared to back them up. You have provided ZERO evidence or literature to support your claims. You don't need me to pick your arguments apart. There are no bones, tendons, or muscles to keep your arguments together. It is just skin with nothing underneath to support it.
You mentioned ONE reference that you can't even quote to support your claim. And an incredibly obscure reference at that so it hold so validity unless the reference is available (and I have a pretty extensive library).
Make claims that you can support with facts and evidence, otherwise you look like someone with a very small amount of knowledge trying to make themselves look respectable by quoting anonymous "scientists" and referencing obscure literature.
I truly am sorry if you are not used to dealing with people that can smell BS under a layer of flower pedals and have the ability to kick the pedals off to show the crap that lies underneath. But hey, get used to it, because we are everywhere.
The bottom line is that you make outrageous claims with no evidence to support other than a "scientist" told you so. Suck it up, get references, or don't make claims that can't be backed up. In this thread, you have provided BAD husbandry advice and backed it up with NOTHING. Just accept that you spoke out of turn about something you know little about and move on.
Have a sweet night.
__________________
Today's Points to Ponder: Owning 2 to 3 snakes does not make you an expert, it just means you have 2 or 3 pets. Quoting irrelevant data from anonymous sources is window dressing for a lack of understanding. Respect is earned, it does not come with post counts. So endeth the lesson.
|
